🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.